Use case and sources
We define the task, users and usable documents. When sources need preparation or regular updates, we scope the required data pipelines.
- Source and access inventory
- Example requests and expected answers
Help your team find answers and prepare the next step.
Finding internal information, preparing a reply or qualifying an enquiry: we define a concrete use case before choosing a model and tools. The assistant uses authorised sources and operates within a scope your team can control.
Search a document collection and find sources that support an answer.
Quality depends on available documents, how current they are and access permissions. An answer should be able to identify its sources or acknowledge missing information.
Prepare a first draft of a reply, summary or document for review.
We define instructions, the expected format and what needs checking. Sensitive or customer-facing content can remain subject to human approval.
Qualify an enquiry or propose an update in a business tool.
Reading and changing data require different permissions. Permitted actions, approvals and logging are defined before connecting the assistant.
We define the task, users and usable documents. When sources need preparation or regular updates, we scope the required data pipelines.
We configure instructions, the interface and connections to your tools. Rules specify what the assistant may read, propose or execute.
We test representative cases, including ambiguous requests and missing information. Monitoring covers answer quality, usage and costs.
We start with a limited scope and observable success criteria.
Choose a task, its users and the situations to handle.
A general-purpose assistant is difficult to evaluate. Real examples let us compare its answers with the team’s expectations and identify tolerable or blocking errors.
Build a prototype and test its answers with your team.
We also examine refusals, unsupported answers and attempts to access information outside scope. One convincing example is not enough to decide on deployment.
Introduce access gradually, gather feedback and address observed limitations.
Documents, models and needs change. We define who maintains sources, reviews incidents and approves changes in behaviour.
An assistant helps a person search, understand or draft. An agent may also carry out a sequence of actions in tools. The terms cover varied uses; what matters is defining permitted actions, approvals and stopping conditions.
That depends on the provider, service and configuration. We review data use terms, retention, access and hosting before selecting a solution. Sensitive information to exclude or protect is identified during scoping.
No. Controlled sources, instructions and testing reduce risk without eliminating it. The assistant should be able to state a limitation and refer to a person. Important decisions or actions that are difficult to undo need suitable checks.
Not necessarily. If rules are stable and data is structured, workflow automation may be enough. AI is worth considering when a task involves language or variable information. We choose the approach based on the need and required controls.
Describe a concrete use case, the available sources and who would review the result.
This service is part of Automate Bolder. Explore related services: Workflow Automation · Data Pipelines.