CMS headless: is it suitable for your Swiss company website?
CMS headless: is it suitable for your Swiss company's website?
Are you hesitating between a traditional CMS and a for your ? Here is the essential to help you decide quickly.
- Traditional CMS: All-in-one, easy to use, but limited in flexibility and performance. Suitable for small projects with little customization or multilingual management.
- Headless CMS: Total separation between content and presentation, ideal for multilingual sites, complex integrations (TWINT, PostFinance), and companies looking to evolve rapidly.
Key points to consider:
- Initial cost: CHF 500 to CHF 5,000 for a traditional CMS, compared to CHF 10,000+ for a headless CMS.
- Multilingual: Complex and redundant management with a traditional CMS, centralized and optimized with a headless CMS.
- Performance: Traditional CMS can slow down with plugins, while headless CMS offers superior speed and scalability.
- Local integrations: Headless CMS allows for more advanced customization for Swiss systems (payments, regulations).
Quick comparative table:
| Criterion | Traditional CMS | Headless CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Initial cost | CHF 500 - CHF 5,000 | CHF 10,000+ |
| Annual maintenance | Included | 15-25% of initial license cost |
| Multilingual management | Complex | Simplified |
| Performance | Average | Optimized |
| Local integrations | Limited | Flexible |
In summary: If your Swiss company has simple needs, a traditional CMS may suffice. But for multilingual projects, complex integrations, or high scalability, a headless CMS is the best option.
The difference between a Traditional CMS and a Headless CMS | Jahia
1. Traditional CMS
A traditional CMS is, in essence, an all-in-one system that combines and presentation. This architecture, while intuitive for some Swiss companies, directly influences the .
Architecture
The architecture of a traditional CMS is based on a close link between the back-end (content management) and the front-end (presentation). Tim Murphy, an expert in content management systems, describes this structure as follows:
"A traditional CMS is a monolithic web content management system that couples its back-end - the administrative interface used to edit and store content - with a front-end, which is the presentation layer that delivers the published content to audiences."
In other words, everything - from content to design - is centralized in the back-end through predefined templates. WordPress, for example, dominates this field with 64.2% of sites using a CMS. This approach offers a simplified user experience, ideal for non-technical users. However, this ease of use comes at a cost: limited flexibility, particularly visible in contexts like multilingual management, essential for Swiss companies.
Multilingual capabilities
For Swiss companies, where multilingualism is often a necessity (French, German, Italian, and even English), traditional CMSs offer solutions based on extensions. These platforms allow managing content in multiple languages through dedicated plugins.
However, these features are not always intuitive. In many cases, developers need to be involved or third-party tools need to be used to effectively organize multilingual content. This complexity can slow down localization projects, which is problematic considering that 72.4% of consumers prefer to buy from sites available in their language.
A concrete example: echonet communication GmbH, a Swiss company, had to develop its own CMS to manage multilingual projects including less common languages like Japanese and Arabic. This example clearly shows that while traditional CMSs provide a foundation for multilingualism, they can also pose challenges in terms of performance and flexibility.
Performance
Performance is a major weakness of traditional CMSs. Their monolithic architecture creates bottlenecks: the back-end and front-end must evolve together, often limiting their ability to meet growing needs.
The excessive use of plugins further exacerbates the problem. For example, nearly 30% of essential WordPress plugins do not receive regular security updates, which can slow down sites and expose them to vulnerabilities. For sectors like finance in Switzerland, where security and speed are crucial, these limitations can seriously impact the .
Moreover, these systems struggle to offer a seamless experience across multiple channels, compromising brand message consistency.
Integration with Swiss systems
Traditional CMSs face significant technical challenges when it comes to integrating with specific systems in the Swiss market. Swiss companies often have to deal with local requirements, such as strict regulations, local payment systems, or specialized management tools.
The monolithic architecture of these platforms limits their ability to easily adapt to these needs. For example, integrating third-party services like Swiss banking systems or billing platforms compliant with local standards often requires expensive and complex developments.
For Swiss companies looking to grow in the long term, these limitations can lead to high infrastructure costs and significant optimization efforts to maintain acceptable performance.
2. Headless CMS
A headless CMS separates content management from its presentation using APIs. This decoupled architecture offers Swiss companies exceptional flexibility to meet the varied needs of the local market.
Architecture
The principle of a headless CMS is based on a total separation between the back-end (content management) and the front-end (presentation), which communicate only through APIs. Unlike traditional monolithic systems, this model allows each component to function independently.
Let's take the example of SABAG, a Swiss company specializing in the construction sector. To modernize its website, SABAG adopted a headless CMS solution combining Strapi and React. UFirst designed a custom solution, offering fully flexible content management.
Marc Birkenmeier, marketing director of SABAG AG, described this transformation as follows:
"The user-friendly back-end interface offers a simple start. Like a modular system, the ready-to-use container elements help you design your website with ease."
This technical independence also simplifies multilingual management, a crucial asset for a market like Switzerland, where multiple languages coexist.
Multilingual capabilities
Headless CMSs stand out for their ability to effectively manage multilingualism. Thanks to their decoupled architecture, they allow content customization for each language or region, while offering integrated internationalization workflows. This approach ensures precise and tailored localization, which can have a direct impact on results: conversion rates increase by up to 70% when users can browse and make purchases in their native language.
Sam Saltis, founder and CEO of Core dna, highlights this advantage:
"Headless and hybrid CMSs have the ability to make creating and managing content for multilingual websites simpler than when using traditional platforms."
In February 2023, Uberall, a Core dna client, used native localization features to effectively manage its multilingual website.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Effortless localization | Manage content in multiple languages without unnecessary duplication |
| Omni-channel delivery | Provide localized content on all platforms via APIs |
| Centralized management | Centralize all translations in a single reliable source |
| Performance optimization | Improve loading speed with a decoupled front-end |
In addition to these linguistic advantages, this architecture significantly improves overall website performance.
Performance
Headless CMSs excel in performance optimization. By separating the back-end and front-end, developers can adjust each part independently, ensuring a faster and smoother user experience. For example, the back-end can handle a high volume of requests while easily adapting to demand.
A concrete case is that of Elastic, which migrated from WordPress to the headless CMS Contentstack. The result? A reduction of server costs by 87%, total expenses reduced by 78%, and a doubling of page views.
Sylvie Shimizu, webmaster at Elastic, shares her experience:
"Contentstack evolves to meet our needs. As we localize and add subdomains for new regions, we can rely on the system to grow with us, no matter the size of our site. Contentstack gives us peace of mind with its technology and its team of highly experienced and responsive CMS experts."
Integration with Swiss systems
Thanks to their API-first architecture, headless CMSs easily integrate with specific systems in the Swiss market. This technical flexibility allows companies to connect their platforms to local banking services, billing tools compliant with Swiss standards, or management software tailored to local needs. SABAG is an excellent example: the company can now deliver content on various channels, whether it's websites, online stores, or even display screens, thanks to its headless back-end.
This modularity allows for building custom digital ecosystems without the limitations of monolithic systems. Furthermore, APIs facilitate adding new features and adapting to local regulatory requirements, an essential aspect for heavily regulated sectors like finance or insurance in Switzerland.
Advantages and disadvantages
The choice between a traditional CMS and a headless CMS largely depends on the goals and resources of your company in Switzerland. Each option offers specific advantages depending on the context in which it is used.
Detailed comparison for the Swiss market
| Criterion | Traditional CMS | Headless CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Initial costs | CHF 500.– to CHF 5,000.– for simple sites | CHF 10,000.– to over CHF 100,000.– |
| Annual maintenance | Generally included | 15–25% of the initial license cost |
| Integration TWINT/PostFinance | Limited to existing plugins | Flexible through custom APIs |
| Multilingual management | Complex, often redundant | Centralized and optimized for FR/DE/IT/EN |
| Performance | May slow down with many plugins | Optimized with lightweight interfaces |
| Scalability | Overall system scalability | Independent evolution of frontend and backend |
Advantages of headless CMS for Switzerland
The table above highlights the main differences, but let's take a closer look at the specific benefits that a headless CMS can offer in the Swiss context.
A headless CMS stands out for its technical flexibility and improved performance, allowing for optimized return on investment. For example, it facilitates direct integration with local payment systems such as TWINT or PostFinance. Unlike traditional CMSs, which often rely on limited third-party plugins, headless CMS enables the development of tailored solutions adapted to the needs of Swiss companies.
A concrete example: GetYourGuide. After adopting Contentstack, this company reduced the time needed to create content by 90%, while customizing experiences for over 500,000 users daily.
Challenges and limitations
Despite its many advantages, headless CMS presents challenges, especially for Swiss companies. Its implementation requires advanced technical skills, which can be problematic for SMEs with limited IT resources.
Deane Barker, director of strategy at Blend Interactive, summarizes this distinction well:
"A decoupled platform is proactive - it prepares content for presentation and pushes it into a delivery environment. A headless CMS is reactive - it manages content, then simply waits for a process to request it."
This reactivity can be a problem for teams accustomed to the WYSIWYG tools of traditional CMSs. In sectors like NGOs in Switzerland, where marketing teams are often less technical, this transition may require significant reorganization.
Performance and impact
Improving performance is a key argument. A 100 ms reduction in loading time can increase revenue by 1%. For Swiss companies operating in e-commerce or financial services, this optimization can make all the difference.
Take the example of Leesa, an American company specializing in mattresses. After migrating to Contentstack, it was able to customize its content on a large scale and increase traffic generated by its articles by 30 times. This type of result illustrates why headless CMS is particularly relevant for companies looking to maximize their digital performance.
Recommendations by sector
Based on the advantages and limitations mentioned, here are some recommendations tailored to different sectors in Switzerland:
- Financial institutions: Headless CMS is ideal for meeting regulatory requirements thanks to its integration capabilities via APIs, facilitating connections with reporting tools.
- NGOs: Centralized language management can significantly improve conversion rates, with increases of up to 70%.
- SMEs: For simple needs, a traditional CMS often remains more suitable, thanks to lower entry costs and ease of use.
These elements underline the importance of a thorough analysis before choosing the solution best suited to your digital strategy in Switzerland.
sbb-itb-454261f
Conclusion
The traditional CMSs and